Title 2, § 437c. Federal Election Commission
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode02/usc_sec_02_00000437---c000-.html(b)
Administration, enforcement, and formulation of policy; exclusive jurisdiction
of civil enforcement; Congressional authorities or functions with respect to
elections for Federal office
(1) The Commission shall administer, seek to
obtain compliance with, and formulate policy with respect to, this Act and
chapter 95 and chapter 96 of title 26. The Commission shall have exclusive
jurisdiction with respect to the civil enforcement of such provisions.
**
whereas that same Chapter 95 of Title 26 referenced above
includes/specifies:
** when referring to aspects of the Presidential
Election Campaign Fund, including
eligibilities...
§ 9011. Judicial review
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00009011----000-.html** which gets most any INDIVIDUAL PERSON the right of STANDING to go after
Obama, via paragraph:
(b) Suits to implement chapter
(1) The Commission,
the national committee of any political party,
and individuals eligible
to vote for President are authorized to institute such actions,
including actions for declaratory judgment or injunctive relief, as may be
appropriate to implement or contrue [1] any provisions of this chapter.
**
while back in Title 2, re: the FEC itself, there is ALSO express/specific
judicial review available again to "any individual eligible to vote in any
election for the office of President"...:
§ 437h. Judicial review
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode02/usc_sec_02_00000437---h000-.htmlsoooo, there is more than one way of obtaining *statutory standing* to sue
Obama, et al... and there are others, too...
The creative legal mind can certainly leverage this statute against Obama,
somehow, hint, hint:
so, skip all of that, except make a mental note
that Congress has "unlawfully" shielded themselves from judicial
accountability?
from United States Code, TITLE 3, The
President:
from United States
Code, TITLE 5, Government Organization and
Employees:
i.e., the FEC is *not* listed as an excluded
"agency" to judicial review
Then, as to compelling the various Secretaries of State (in the various
different sister States) to "ensure validity" of Obama's qualifications and
eligibility, those such Plaintiffs can maybe use:
§ 1502. Influencing
elections; taking part in political campaigns; prohibitions; exceptions
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00001502----000-.htmlparticulary
paragraph (a)(1) and maybe also (a)(2) thereof
Heck, also under Title 5, you could use the compelling of the Merit Systems
Protection Board, in the same way as compelling the Director of OPM above,
pursuant to
Also under Title 5 of the United States Code are other commanding
"loyalty" statutes, such as
§ 3333. Employee affidavit; loyalty and striking (
think:
"withholding Presidential records") against the Government
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00003333----000-.htmland
by following through to the referenced statute therein:
§ 7311. Loyalty and
striking
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00007311----000-.html"An
individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United
States or the government of the District of Columbia if he—
(1) advocates
the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;"
i.e., we find that
Obama is *affirmatively* violating paragraph (1) above, every day, as long as he
refuses or "fails to qualify" as Prez under the Constitutional manner dictated,
refuses to "make public" his "Presidential records" as per law, etc...
from United States
Code, TITLE 8, Aliens and Nationality:
which also, by the way, adds a nice touch of direct
conflict-of-interests into the game :)
Maybe a clever Plaintiff party could leverage this statute into
deciding the eligibility issue from another angle:
§ 1501. Certificate of diplomatic or consular officer of United States as
to loss of American nationality
see also:
§ 1642. Verification of eligibility for Federal public
benefits
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001642----000-.htmlObama's
various federal benefits, i.e., wages, medical, pension, etc., cannot be
received by any "alien"
"proof of citizenship" required under (a)(2)
thereunder, but admittedly maybe a stretch to implement...
also, add any
federal benefits being received by Michelle Obama, and by his two daughters,
even?...
see also:
§ 1644. Communication between State and local
government agencies and Immigration and Naturalization Service
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001644----000-.html
from United States
Code, TITLE 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure:
Referenced several times above,
can be used against Obama, or ANY other federal official...
And, don't ever forget about the awesome power and flexibility of
seeking any kind of WRIT:
§ 1651. Writs
from United States
Code, TITLE 42, The Public Health and Welfare:
and likewise regarding Obama's continued concealment of records, but used
under his OWN voting qualifications in Chicago, in both 2004 and 2008:
§
1974a. Theft, destruction, concealment, mutilation, or alteration of records or
papers; penalties
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00001974---a000-.htmland
the procedure to implement (hint, use "
ex rel State of Illinois"?)
§
1974b. Demand for records or papers by Attorney General or representative;
statement of basis and purpose
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00001974---b000-.htmland,
so, of course, the jurisdictional hook:
§ 1974d. Jurisdiction to compel
production of records or papers
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00001974---d000-.html
While, all sorts of different "teams" and "organizations" including Obama
in them can be arranged/claimed/accused under
along with the obligatory Section 1983 civil rights claims, of
course...
from United States
Code, TITLE 44, Public Printing and
Documents:
includes the mandates regarding all "Presidential Records" - see all
info/ammo at very top.
from United States
Code, TITLE 50, War and National Defense:
Can we spell all of the different names of the "radicals" associated with
Obama, both prior and present, stir in a little Acorn soup, allege the basic,
obvious facts on paper, and leverage this, even? The skilled
legal practioner can surely do it:
And, just for good measure, everything you wanted to know about the new
Presidential declaration of National Emergency regarding the swine flu, or H1N1
derivative, and including how and when to terminate any national emergency:
Heck, people, all of that is JUST from
pouring through ONLY the entire United States Code (USC). What if
someone took the time to sift through *the entire* Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), maybe research the available Secret Service documentation, manuals,
and etc., or the same sets of endless rules and regulations from other
relevant federal agencies/departments? What if Obama is breaking the law -
again - every time he flies out of the country, and then "tries to re-enter" our
Nation? Do you get the point? The age-old adage is that "no man
is above the law", and, yet, people think the cliche is true, that high
government officers can merely *get away* with acting like they are "above the
law" - yet, I tell you the simple truth: the higher a government
official is in rank, the more and more rules, regulations, laws and
other authorities that exist in relation to their position, and they have,
effectively, even more and more "leashes" snaring them down.. watching their
every move. Indeed, I would call Obama the man who is "most UNDER
the law" in America, actually... every Presidential candidate must
be *necessarily* prepared to accept that role for his or her entire term of
office... to be the most-leashed public servant that there is... to be subject
to intense scrutiny... and, via 'on paper', i.e., accountable to the
greatest amount and numbers of variously written laws...
The point is, Patriots
of the United States of America, that there
are various EASY and COMMANDING ways, already in full force of law,
with which to obtain the "eligibility" records sought, or to find no sufficient
records exist, and bring an end to this utter nonsense of a
circus, if only a **comprehensive** review of the matters be done and actually implemented.
REPEAT OF SUMMARY:
The law of the United States Code is extremely
clear, even often in multiple times and multiple ways, that:
a) the AG *cannot* represent/defend Obama in
any challenge that involves a question of his
nationality/citizenship, for the relevant statutory laws mandate that the
AG be on the *prosecuting* side against Obama, if the
AG is involved at all...
b) the AG also *cannot* represent/defend
Senators or the Senate body, itself, in these constitutional
questions, either...
c) there are various statutory
standings provided for even "mere" individual Citizens to sue Obama,
Congress, etc.
d) Obama's "Presidential records" are
expressly PUBLIC by mandate of law (and, combined with using AG
Holder & U.S. Attorneys, i.e., our *taxdollars*, in an
expressly-unconstitutional manner, defending Obama in citizenship issues, then
Obama gets to pay back every single red cent of that $1.7 million spent so
far... plus interest and penalties).
e) additionally, there are all sorts of
federal agencies/heads to go after Obama's eligibility through, by
statutes.
ADDITIONAL LEGAL THEORIES &
ARGUMENTS:
Lastly, let me also point out and ardently remind
of these important items to consider into the mix:
1) - Clinton was held in contempt
by a federal court, while he was
still the President, ergo, jurisdiction exists:
(See also, most especially, Nixon v. Fitzgerald, Jenness
v. Fortson, Bush v. Gore,
Kawakita v. U.S., U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, U.S. v.
Rhodes, and Scheuer v.
Rhodes [a different "Rhodes" case, unrelated], all
from SCOTUS)
2) - Congress, itself,
routinely turns to the judiciary to resolve issues,
even to sue the President:
3) - EVERY President is sued in
order to compel official duties, all the dang time, by business,
individuals, and even other government and quasi-government entities. Just
one example out of literally thousands:
and go look at the online dockets and archived
opinions of the various federal court types physically located in
DC...
4) - Heck, it's even "ok" to actually sue the White
House Executives for scandalous allegations of outright
fraud:
5) - You have to remember/realize the REASON
*why* Obama goes around hiding/concealing records...
because that is exactly what he has been taught from birth to
do... His mother obviously embroiled herself into some sort of "bend
rules" stuff over Barry's birth, somehow, and necessarily with someone
else.. and HAD to later tell her son at least *something* about his
unusual citizenship situation, at some time in his life. Further, with all
the moving around the world (her work and etc.), especially to and through
countries that were NOT being friendly with the United
States, he was also taught through childhood NOT to have too much respect for
the United States, or its culture and society... That's the kind of
friends and others who Obama hung around with quite often during his
formative childhood, teenage, and young adult years. Also, of course, all
that passing through various nations in political turmoils might typically
require travelers to forge and fake documents and statements, just to avoid delays and problems.. And,
later, for Barry to take a new muslim/african name while living in the
United States, in order to demonstrate to his similar-thinking friends his
"independence" and "repugnance" of the "establishment" level of the same United
States. And, momma was right there, the whole time while Obama grew up,
"explaining" away the "shortcuts" that they needed to take, just to get
around and survive sometimes... teaching him, by example, to do the same
thing as "needed"... Probably helping little Barry fill out student loan
paperwork, too, as he prepared to enter his first college or university,
right?? Is Obama hiding something in his various records? Oh, that's
a given, easily. Nationality/citizenship is surely not the only thing
being concealed. He very likely has taken all sorts of federal financial
benefits, student and/or small business loans, congressional perks, and/or now
presidential stuff, that he wouldn't even otherwise be regularly qualified for,
in the first place, let alone the impostor citizen status to complicate things
even that much further. Sure, he is also a Constitutional scholar himself,
also taught to remember that there was the opportunity of better weath and life
in America, that country he was likely daily taught to otherwise despise,
but he was surely taught, and taught often, to "bend the rules" on
nationality/citizenship paperwork as needed... Want confirmation?
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Dunham and
there Obama's quote about his mother, who was: "the dominant figure in my formative years... The values she taught
me continue to be my touchstone when it comes to how I go about the world of
politics." Oh, yeah, I am confident he is hiding more than
just mere citizenship issues... And, by the way, from recent story
developments, it could actually be that little Barry's mother was NOT married to
his father, at all. Could it actually be that, maybe, just maybe, Ms.
Dunham was *also not* a bona fide citizen of the United States,
either???
6) - Mr. Berg, Dr. Taitz, and Mr. Apuzzo,
especially, but along with all other plaintiffs/counsel, would do well to
consider the ramifications - and power - of the first two paragraphs, paragraph
(a)(1) and paragraph (a)(2), here:
7) - Sooo, what?? You get Obama thrown out of
office... NOW what? What THEN? WHO
becomes the next President? The answer, again, is very simple:
Per the original Constitution, Mr. John McCain IS the *temporary* President, and
Mr. Ralph Nader IS the *temporary* Vice-President, while a proper Re-Election is
done promptly, say within 120 to 180 days of new
campaigning time period allowed from date of judicial ruling, using
***distinct*** voting/balloting for the offices of President and Vice-President,
and *only* those all same 2008 Prez and VP candidates run
again, if they so choose to do again, but the mandatory result of the
true Constitutional law and design is that you almost certainly end up with one
(1) White House Executive from EACH/BOTH of the top two political parties, i.e.,
most likely either McCain as Prez with Hillary as Vice-Prez, or the reverse,
Hillary as Prez with McCain as Vice-Prez, because of simple mathematics and the
Constitutional selection process involved, i.e., the top two political
strengths/parties each get one of the top two Executive positions, President and
Vice-President. That's pre-12th Amendment, like it *should be* still
done. But, even after the 12th Amendment (1804-1805, enacted-ratified),
the campaign law hasn't been followed correctly since the 1870s, and the "newer"
opportunity of "running for" Vice-President is **supposed** to be ran for
independently from the balloting/voting process of the
candidates for President. So, in the current state of things, the
Re-Election of 2008, done under present (don't strike down the) 12th Amendment
rule, we must end up with ONE of the Presidential candidates, and ONE of the
Vice-Presidential candidates, but NOT necessarily, and NOT
even probably or likely, being of the *same* party. In other
words, under the current law in place for 200+ years, and that was suddenly
ceased to be followed during the 1870s, we should have had 2008 results
like: Obama/Palin, Hillary/Palin, McCain/Biden, Baldwin/Palin,
Nader/Biden, or etc. - any Prez candidate that wins Prez + any Vice-Prez
candidate that wins the SEPARATELY DONE race for the Vice-Presidency...
Or, again, what's even easier.. simply go back to pre-12th Amendment, like it
should best be done anyway (strike the 12th Amend. down), and you
have no race for VP, at all, itself, but the two top Prez candidates become 1st
(Prez) and 2nd (Vice-Prez) in number of votes obtained. Simple. Balanced.
Elegant. It's *supposed* to always be a Joint Administration (politically)
in the White House, anyway. And, that law and design and
intent always was
followed, too, until the 1870s... when the new mega-wealth "barons" and
"tycoons" entered onto the American scene through vast new enterprises in
railroads, steel, telegraphs, newspapers, etc., and began to *really* take over,
in bending and stretching the political process to suit their own
desires. Those damn Banksters... greed, the oldest sin of
all..
But then, the Word of God - twice - clearly reminds
the inescapable truth:
"You cannot serve both God and
Mammon."
And, it also clearly reminds: "My people
perish for lack of knowledge."
Points proven for God's Word, as always
being solid truth and wisdom, once again...
CALL TO
ACTION:
Especially to Mr. Apuzzo and Dr. Taitz, in
respective timeline order: Regardless of filing appeal to your
Circuit, you should certainly -- certainly (is everybody watching
them??) -- incorporate some of the above, and file your immediate motions for
reconsideration, based on newly discovered authority, etc. Mr.
Apuzzo has until this coming Wednesday, November 4th
to file any motion for alteration of judgment (Dismissal entered 10/21/09, ten
(10) "business" days, per FRCP Rule
6(a)(2)), to file motion under FRCP Rule 59), while Dr.
Taitz has the same ten business days allotted since Judge
Carter's ruling was entered, and she can also slap that traitor Judge
Land back with a Rule
60(b) motion, because - omg!! - even *thinking* about any *sanctions* during
a *political question* case violates everything known to man... hint,
hint... let alone the fact that Judge Land was outLANDish
and wrong, in the first place. The above statutes under U.S. Code
prove it.
To all "Obama eligibility"
Plaintiffs/Counsel: Please now implement the above clear mandates of
federal statutory law, and thereby take away all further notions of
"discretion", "doctrine", or any other interference or
delay. Command your victory. There is
absolutely NO legally plausible **excuse** for Obama violating his statutory
duties to make his "Presidential records" made ALL and immediately
public domain. Period. End of story. Sooo,
bye-bye, Mr. Obama, 'et al.'
To all "NObama" - "End The Fed" -
"Go Sarah" - "Hillary" - and other supporters: Please forward out widely
to all available forums/groups/etc., at least the basic "hammers" above,
especially the legal mandate of Obama's "Presidential records" being made full
public items for inspection/review. It is actually YOUR tireless communications/distribution
work that actually gets the hooks baited, fish caught, cleaned, cooked
and eaten tonight for supper. Thank you.
Yeah, that's right. I have chosen to
live near poverty for years now, fighting part-time or more for restoration
of America.
If you like my help, I could sure use
donations, left side PayPal on http://unitedcivilrights.org,
to upgrade to full-time restoration work.
That would help a whole lot to get this all done, and America back on a good
Constitutional course.
That way, instead of having to spend large chunks
of my time working on people's individual due process and other cases out there,
I could focus on nothing but restoring America's Constitutional Heritage through
various legal HAMMERS actually implemented, sooner...............................
Thanks!
Sincerest Regards,
------------------------------------------
Mr. Torm Howse
Co-Founder, National Board Director, Instructor,
United Civil Rights
Councils of America
http://unitedcivilrights.org
Co-Founder,
National Board Director, Trustee,
Parental Alienation Awareness Organization
- US
http://paao-us.com
Founder, Owner,
President,
The FIDO Network
http://fidonetwork.com
General
Contact:
P.O. Box 68665
Indianapolis, Indiana 46268
(317)
286-2538 office (888) 738-4643 fax
indianacrc@earthlink.net
Increase Your FAITH!